what are the current laws about physicians talking to patients about gun control

In 2014, a total of 33 599 Americans died of gunshot wounds (1). Although the chance for firearm-related homicide is highest amongst immature African American men, virtually firearm-related deaths are suicides, for which older white men are at highest risk (2). Public mass shootings account for a small percentage of firearm-related deaths but are occurring more frequently and could impact the graphic symbol of public life in the The states (3). In early 2013, more than 40% of Americans worried that they could fall victim to firearm-related homicide or attack (4).

Physicians seek to prevent important health bug at the individual and population levels. They inquire and counsel—routinely in some cases, selectively in others—nigh a wide range of health-related behaviors and weather. In certain circumstances, they disclose otherwise confidential information to 3rd parties to limit the gamble an affected person poses to others.

Physicians generally do not do well at firearm-related injury prevention, however. They ask infrequently nigh firearms and counsel poorly, if at all, although they are aware that the high lethality of firearms makes prevention efforts particularly of import.

In this article, we examine several commonly cited barriers to practicing preventive medicine for firearm-related injuries. Some physicians believe that it is against the law to discuss firearms; nosotros show that this conventionalities is unfounded. We then discuss the circumstances in which prevention efforts might be virtually advisable. We briefly review other barriers to their more widespread adoption, patients' opinions nearly physicians addressing firearms, and the effectiveness of such prevention practices; more than extensive data is available elsewhere (5, 6). We offering specific recommendations, based on the limited prove available, for how physicians tin can incorporate firearm-related injury prevention into the care of their patients.

Yous Can Ask

No federal or country statute prohibits physicians from asking about firearms when such information is relevant to the health of the patient or others.

Federal Statute

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Human action (ACA) regulates the collection of firearm data, merely the scope of these provisions is narrow (Table 1). Most important, the ACA prohibits required collection of firearm data past "wellness and health promotion" programs. The Obama administration'due south position was reflected in a January 2013 White House proclamation that, to "protect the rights of health intendance providers to talk to their patients about gun condom," it would outcome guidance clarifying that the ACA does non regulate communication between physicians and patients about firearms (7). The U.S. Department of Labor repeated this clarification (8); to our noesis, this guidance has not been issued.

Tabular array 1. Language From Relevant Federal and Country Statutes*

State Statutes

Florida

The simply existing gag law is Florida'south medical privacy act concerning firearms (Table 1), enacted in 2011 later a serial of inflammatory incidents occurred during clinician–patient interactions. In one widely publicized incident, a pediatrician in Ocala discharged from care 3 children whose mother declined to respond questions about firearms (9, x).

Florida's constabulary is seen as intruding on the patient–physician relationship (11). Its key provisions concur that health practitioners "should refrain" from asking about firearms and "may not intentionally enter" firearm information into medical records. At that place are broad exceptions, all the same. A practitioner who "in good organized religion believes that this information is relevant to the patient's medical care or rubber, or the prophylactic of others" may ask most firearms, and only information that "is not relevant to the patient's medical care or safety, or the safety of others" is excluded from medical records (12).

Physicians and medical professional organizations challenged the law in U.S. District Court, contending that information technology disproportionately restricted their First Subpoena rights. They were successful (9), but that conclusion was overturned past a divided 3-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Excursion (x, xiii). In February 2016, the full courtroom vacated its panel's conclusion and agreed to rehear the case (14). The Commune Court determination remains in effect.

Other States

Three states—Montana, Missouri, and Minnesota—have statutes addressing firearm information caused by health practitioners or agencies. None includes a gag provision. Montana prohibits requiring patients to provide firearm data as a status of receiving wellness care (15). Missouri prohibits requiring that health professionals collect or record firearm information, but with an exception "if such enquiry or documentation is necessitated or medically indicated past the wellness care professional's judgment" (xvi). Minnesota prohibits drove of firearm data by its country health commissioner and MNsure, the agency administering its wellness insurance exchange (17, xviii).

More restrictive proposals accept been considered elsewhere. In 2015, North Carolina's legislature debated prohibiting the drove of firearm data in any written form and the disclosure of responses to firearm-related questions "unless the patient has been adjudicated incompetent due to mental affliction" (19). A true gag law proposal was introduced in Ohio in June 2015: "A medico shall not ask a patient or prospective patient … [any] question related to the buying or possession of a firearm" (xx). As of April 2016, no activeness had been taken on this nib.

When to Ask

Firearm data would be directly relevant to the health of an private patient and that patient'south close contacts under 3 full general conditions (Table 2). Where physician preference or uncomplicated lack of time precludes routine screening for firearm access, physicians could identify patients for whom these weather condition apply and continue selectively.

Table 2. Conditions When Firearm Information Might Be Especially Relevant to the Health of a Patient and Potentially to Others

The get-go arises when a patient provides data or exhibits behavior suggesting an acutely increased risk for violence, such as explicit or implicit endorsement of suicidal or homicidal intent or ideation. This is an emergency; the need to determine admission to lethal means for such patients is self-evident.

The second involves patients who possess other private-level risk factors for future violence. A history of violence perpetration is a potent predictor of future violence in the general population (21) and amid firearm owners (22). Similarly, patients hospitalized or treated in emergency departments for fierce victimization are at high risk for committing violence (23, 24). Booze abuse is common in the general population and amongst firearm owners (25) and is a well-established risk cistron for interpersonal and self-directed firearm violence (26). Drug corruption is another take a chance cistron, simply the magnitude of the risk may exist drug-specific (27).

Serious mental disease is a relatively minor risk factor for violence to others, and hazard depends on the nature of the affliction (28, 29). Alcohol and drug abuse, prior violence, and violent victimization account for much of the take chances popularly ascribed to mental disease (30, 31). Cocky-directed violence is very strongly linked to mental disease, however. Suicide risk is increased by a factor of at least 10 across a range of psychiatric diagnoses, and an estimated 47% to 74% of suicides are directly attributable to mental disorders (thirty). Violence risk is particularly high among patients seen for mental illness in emergency departments, recently discharged psychiatric inpatients, and persons experiencing a first psychotic episode (30). Encephalon disorders associated with impaired cognition and judgment, such as Alzheimer illness, are associated with an increased risk for assailment and violence (32).

Third, questions well-nigh firearms would be relevant for patients in demographic groups that are at increased risk for firearm-related injury. Middle-aged and older white men are at high risk for firearm-related suicide (up to v times higher than black men of the same historic period), and young African American men are 20 times as likely as young white men to dice of firearm-related homicide (ane). Children and adolescents may engage in take chances behaviors with firearms considering their judgment and cerebral skills are not fully developed (33).

Persons with risk factors, including substance abuse disorders, diagnosed mental illness, impulsive acrimony, suicidal ideation, and dementia, study admission to firearms at levels similar to those in the general population (34–39). Persons with multiple risk factors are a high-priority group, because gamble is likely more than additive in such cases (22, 40).

Questions about firearms may be appropriate when the patient is non a firearm owner, given that risk for victimization may extend to all household members if one is at risk for violence and firearms are present. For instance, firearm-related questions would be advisable if a patient's intimate partner exhibited violence and driveling alcohol.

Barriers

High proportions of physicians (66% to 84%) believe they have the right to counsel patients well-nigh firearms (41) and a responsibleness to engage in efforts to prevent firearm-related injuries (42, 43). The American University of Pediatrics has long recommended that physicians provide counseling (44); since the passage of the Florida police force, many other medical specialty societies have made similar recommendations (45).

Actual exercise is some other affair. Screening and counseling about firearms is uncommon, whether equally anticipatory guidance (46) or a selective intervention (47–49). For example, in a study of veterans who screened positive for suicidal thoughts, but 15% of providers documented whether patients had access to firearms (l).

Many barriers be. Perhaps the most important is clinician unfamiliarity with the benefits and risks of firearm ownership, with what to say during firearm safety counseling and how to say it, and with firearms themselves (41, 43, 48, 51–53). It is prudent to avoid areas of practice when one is unfamiliar with the evidence, and in fairness, too trivial solid evidence exists. These barriers tin exist addressed through preparation (54) and through development of information well-nigh referral resources (55, 56).

Physicians may worry about damaging the patient human relationship (48) by asking questions that seem intrusive or invite discord (57). They may experience uncomfortable asking about firearms, fifty-fifty when they are well-informed (48, 51), or worry that patients will non exist truthful (48). Some may believe that firearm counseling is outside their scope of do (51, 57) or that discussing firearms could infringe on patients' Second Subpoena rights (43, 58). Fortunately, studies of patient perspectives on firearm counseling accept found that most—although certainly non all—patients seem to exist open to nonjudgmental education, especially for members of high-adventure groups (48, 57, 59). The American Bar Clan has stated that 2nd Amendment rights are not afflicted by asking and counseling about firearms (45). Finally, clinicians may doubt the effectiveness of firearm counseling, especially given time limitations and competing clinical priorities (43, 51, 60).

Benefits

Inquiry on practices to preclude firearm-related injury is in its infancy; too few studies have been done. For example, a recent systematic review identified no studies of the accuracy or predictive value of screening for firearm access amid loftier-risk patients (v). Such absence of bear witness is common. Except for a few behavioral screens endorsed by the U.Southward. Preventive Services Task Force (61), in that location are few clinically based studies of valid screening tools for other frequently encountered risk behaviors. Notwithstanding, the Joint Commission has, for example, mandated screening for suicide among high-risk inpatient and emergency section populations (62). Because firearms are the most common means of violent expiry in the The states, the lack of rigorously validated tools should not, in itself, deter screening.

Many, but not all, studies of clinical interventions to prevent firearm-related injuries accept shown increased firearm safety behaviors among populations at high risk for injury. No interventions have resulted in harm (5, vi).

Most studies have assessed interventions in principal care settings. In one randomized, controlled trial, a screening, cursory intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) intervention involving particularly trained pediatricians led to increased condom firearm storage in households with children (63). Other observational and intervention studies accept had positive results, including decreased firearm access amidst suicidal teens and adults (64, 65) and increased safe firearm storage in households with children (66–69). Afterwards cursory counseling by a psychiatrist, for example, almost one third of suicidal adolescents' families removed a firearm from the home (68). Considering at that place was no control population, nosotros practise not know how many families would have removed a firearm without intervention. Firearm counseling may be less effective when combined with other interventions or delivered universally (70–72).

Hospital- and emergency department–based interventions using SBIRT methods or comprehensive case management take shown promise in reducing the run a risk for repeated violence (73, 74). A randomized trial of a collaborative care programme, including brief interventions, comprehensive example management, and as-needed mental health treatment, showed decreased weapon carrying amid adolescents hospitalized afterward an injury (75). Many studies have relied on surrogate outcomes or had shortcomings in design or execution, such every bit frequent loss to follow-up. Controlled trials and a systematic review now in progress (74) volition hopefully clarify the role of these interventions.

How to Ask and Counsel

The provider's attitude is critical (76). Patients are more open to firearm safety counseling when providers are not prescriptive simply focus on well-being and safe—specially where children are concerned—and involve the family unit in respectful discussions (48, 57). Conversations should acknowledge local cultural norms (57); be individualized (48); and, when possible, occur within a well-established clinician–patient relationship (57). Acute care physicians, such as hospitalists and emergency physicians, should intervene when run a risk is increased or they run across a teachable moment. Nosotros suggest, "Don't just enquire, inform"; emphasize education, non just information gathering (48, 57).

Giving a context for firearm-related questions tin heighten the interaction. For anticipatory guidance, a firearm-related question tin be included in routine screening for household hazards or risk behaviors (57). For selective screening in patients with other adventure factors, nosotros recommend that clinicians briefly explain why firearms might exist relevant to the patient'south well-being and safety.

The kickoff question might simply be, "Are any firearms kept in or around your home?" When the answer is "yep," 2 follow-upward questions are important: "Do any of these firearms vest to you personally?" and "Are any of these firearms stored loaded and not locked away?"

What to exercise with the answers depends on the circumstances (Table 2). Questions and advice well-nigh safe storage might make use of the "5 Ls" mnemonic (Locked, Loaded, Little children, feeling Low, Learned owner [77, 78]), accompanied by a nonjudgmental educational handout (Table iii) and data on firearm storage devices (Table iv). The desired outcome is that firearms are stored unloaded and locked, with ammunition stored separately. Safe storage is less common when other risk factors are present.

Table 3. Materials for Distribution to Patients

Table iv. Firearm Safe Storage Options*

For patients at risk for violence, counseling to reduce access to lethal ways of damage ("lethal ways counseling") (69, 79) is indicated; mental health, social service, and substance corruption referrals may exist appropriate. Information technology may become important for the patient to temporarily relinquish custody of firearms to family members, gun shops, or law enforcement, as allowed by state law. California's new Gun Violence Restraining Gild statute allows family members or police force enforcement officers to petition for a court club that firearms exist recovered for safekeeping in such cases (80). Connecticut, Indiana, and Texas also permit for mandated firearm recovery. Other states may soon follow.

The advisability of having firearms at home may come up up for word. Clinicians can point to a large torso of prove establishing that, on balance, firearms in the home (81) and purchasing a handgun (82) are associated with a substantial and long-lasting increased risk for vehement death.

You Tin Disclose

The Code of Federal Regulations, in provisions governing the Wellness Insurance Portability and Accountability Deed, lists specific situations in which protected health information may exist disclosed (83). These include occasions when disclosure "is necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the wellness or safety of a person or the public and … is to a person or persons reasonably able to forbid or lessen the threat, including the target of the threat."

The Obama administration has emphasized that disclosure is permissible: "No federal law prevents health care providers from warning law enforcement authorities about threats of violence" (vii). A letter from the U.S. Department of Wellness and Human being Services added that "a health care provider may disembalm patient information, including information from mental wellness records, if necessary, to constabulary enforcement, family members of the patient, or any other persons who may reasonably be able to prevent or lessen the risk of damage" (84).

There is no agreed-on definition of the key term "imminent"; in enquiry on violence prediction, information technology describes time frames ranging from a few days to months (85). Elsewhere in the Code of Federal Regulations, an imminent gamble is defined every bit i that may crusade impairment before information technology can be alleviated by a formal regulatory activeness.

At that place is besides no clear guidance on informing patients of such disclosures. The American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics Manual states, "In general, individuals have the right to full and detailed [information]" (86). Timing and other specifics will vary because "upsetting news and data should be presented … in a style that minimizes distress." Citing the American Medical Clan (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics (87), ACP'due south manual adds that decisions not to inform patients (one time referred to every bit therapeutic privilege) should be rare. However, the AMA Lawmaking stresses that "therapeutic privilege does not refer to withholding medical information in emergency situations" and allows for delayed disclosure even in nonemergency situations (87). As in domestic violence and child abuse cases, providers should go along from a right-to-know position, determining when and whether a patient is informed on the basis of the provider'southward cess of the patient'due south cognitive condition and "the residual of benefits and harms" (87) expected to result from providing the information.

Conclusions

Medical specialty societies recommend request and counseling about firearms during routine patient care or every bit an chemical element of risk assessment (45). Neither the police force nor the 2nd Amendment prohibits such activities, and the Outset Amendment may protect them. The express evidence on effectiveness is encouraging, and the need for boosted enquiry should not impede efforts to provide patient care consistent with the best information bachelor (Table 5).

Table 5. Additional Resources

More training and better resource are needed. A systematic review identified only four reports on the development and assessment of grooming for clinicians (88). Input from clinician and nonclinician firearm owners is important (51). Collaborations with firearm retailers to prevent suicide are being tested in New England, the Rocky Mountain states, and Washington and may become of import (89).

We recommend that, at a minimum, clinicians determine admission to firearms for patients who fall into any of the take chances categories discussed previously. Depending on the circumstances, interventions may include education; counseling in support of beliefs alter; or more direct efforts, such every bit disclosure to others, to prevent decease or serious injury.

References

• ane. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injury Prevention & Control: Data & Statistics (WISQARS). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Illness Control and Prevention; 2014. Accessed at world wide web.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html on 11 April 2016. Google Scholar
• 2. Wintemute GJ .The epidemiology of firearm violence in the twenty-start century United States. Annu Rev Public Health .2015;36:5-19. [PMID: 25533263] doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122535 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• three. Krouse WJ , Richardson DJ .Mass Murder with Firearms: Incidents and Victims, 1999–2013. Report no. R44126. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service;2015. Google Scholar
• 4. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Wellness Tracking Poll. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family unit Foundation; 2013. Accessed at https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/8418-t1.pdf on 24 August 2015. Google Scholar
• 5. Roszko PJ , Ameli J , Carter PM , Cunningham RM , Ranney ML .Clinician attitudes, screening practices, and interventions to reduce firearm-related injury. Epidemiol Rev .2016;38:87-110. [PMID: 26905894] doi:10.1093/epirev/mxv005 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• half dozen. Rowhani-Rahbar A , Simonetti JA , Rivara FP .Effectiveness of interventions to promote safe firearm storage. Epidemiol Rev .2016;38:111-24. [PMID: 26769724] doi:10.1093/epirev/mxv006 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• vii. The White House. Now Is the Time: The President's Plan to Protect Our Children and Our Communities by Reducing Gun Violence. Washington, DC: The White House; 2013. Accessed at www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/wh_now_is_the_time_full.pdf on 21 January 2013. Google Scholar
• 8. U.S. Section of Labor. FAQs about Affordable Care Deed Implementation Part XI. Washington, DC: U.S. Section of Labor; 2013. Accessed at www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq-aca11.html on 1 September 2015. Google Scholar
• nine. Wollschlaeger et al v. Farmer et al. 880 F Supp 2d 1251 (SD Fla 2012). Google Scholar
• 10. Wollschlaeger et al 5 Governor of Florida et al. 760 F3d 1195 (11th Cir 2014). Google Scholar
• 11. Weinberger SE , Lawrence HC 3rd , Henley DE , Alden ER , Hoyt DB .Legislative interference with the patient-medico relationship. N Engl J Med .2012;367:1557-nine. [PMID: 23075183] doi:x.1056/NEJMsb1209858 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 12. Fla. Stat. Ann. §790.338 (2015). Google Scholar
• 13. Wollschlaeger et al five Governor of Florida et al: On Petition for Rehearing. 797 F3d 859 (11th Cir 2015). Google Scholar
• 14. Wollschlaeger et al 5 Governor of Florida et al: Order for Rehearing. 797 F3d 859 (11th Cir 2016). Google Scholar
• 15. Mont. Code Ann. §l-16-108 (2014). Google Scholar
• 16. Mo. Rev. Stat. §571.012 (2015). Google Scholar
• 17. Minn. Stat. §144.05 (2015). Google Scholar
• 18. Minn. Stat. §62V.06 (2015). Google Scholar
• 19. HR 562, Sess 2015 (N.C. 2015). Google Scholar
• 20. Southward 177, 131st Sess (Ohio 2015). Google Scholar
• 21. Cook PJ , Ludwig J , Braga AA .Criminal records of homicide offenders. JAMA .2005;294:598-601. [PMID: 16077054] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22. Wintemute GJ , Drake CM , Beaumont JJ , Wright MA , Parham CA .Prior misdemeanor convictions every bit a gamble cistron for later violent and firearm-related criminal activity among authorized purchasers of handguns. JAMA .1998;280:2083-7. [PMID: 9875875] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23. Rowhani-Rahbar A , Zatzick D , Wang J , Mills BM , Simonetti JA , Fan MD ,et al.Firearm-related hospitalization and risk for subsequent violent injury, death, or offense perpetration: a accomplice report. Ann Intern Med .2015;162:492-500. [PMID: 25706337]. doi:10.7326/M14-2362 LinkGoogle Scholar
• 24. Cunningham RM , Carter PM , Ranney Chiliad , Zimmerman MA , Blow FC , Berth BM ,et al.Violent reinjury and mortality amidst youth seeking emergency department care for assault-related injury: a 2-year prospective cohort study. JAMA Pediatr .2015;169:63-70. [PMID: 25365147] doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1900 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 25. Wintemute GJ .Clan between firearm ownership, firearm-related risk and risk reduction behaviours and alcohol-related risk behaviours. Inj Prev .2011;17:422-7. [PMID: 21670071] doi:x.1136/ip.2010.031443 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 26. Wintemute GJ .Alcohol misuse, firearm violence perpetration, and public policy in the U.s.a.. Prev Med .2015;79:15-21. [PMID: 25937594] doi:ten.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.015 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27. McGinty EE , Choksy S , Wintemute GJ .The relationship between controlled substances and violence. Epidemiol Rev .2016;38:5-31. [PMID: 26905893] doi:10.1093/epirev/mxv008 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28. Pulay AJ , Dawson DA , Hasin DS , Goldstein RB , Ruan WJ , Pickering RP ,et al.Violent beliefs and DSM-IV psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Weather. J Clin Psychiatry .2008;69:12-22. [PMID: 18312033] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 29. Van Dorn R , Volavka J , Johnson North .Mental disorder and violence: is there a relationship across substance utilize? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol .2012;47:487-503. [PMID: 21359532] doi:10.1007/s00127-011-0356-x CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 30. Swanson JW , McGinty EE , Fazel S , Mays VM .Mental illness and reduction of gun violence and suicide: bringing epidemiologic enquiry to policy. Ann Epidemiol .2015;25:366-76. [PMID: 24861430] doi:x.1016/j.annepidem.2014.03.004 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31. Johnson KL, Desmarais SL, Grimm KJ, Tueller SJ, Swartz MS, Van Dorn RA. Proximal hazard factors for curt-term community violence amidst adults with mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv. 2016:appips201500259. . [PMID: 26927580] Google Scholar
• 32. Liljegren G , Naasan G , Temlett J , Perry DC , Rankin KP , Merrilees J ,et al.Criminal behavior in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer affliction. JAMA Neurol .2015;72:295-300. [PMID: 25559744] doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3781 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 33. Dowd MD , Sege RD ;Council on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention Executive Commission.Firearm-related injuries affecting the pediatric population. Pediatrics .2012;130:e1416-23. [PMID: 23080412] doi:x.1542/peds.2012-2481 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 34. Swanson JW , Sampson NA , Petukhova MV , Zaslavsky AM , Appelbaum PS , Swartz MS ,et al.Guns, impulsive aroused behavior, and mental disorders: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Behav Sci Police force .2015;33:199-212. [PMID: 25850688] doi:10.1002/bsl.2172 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 35. Ilgen MA , Zivin K , McCammon RJ , Valenstein Chiliad .Mental illness, previous suicidality, and access to guns in the U.s.. Psychiatr Serv .2008;59:198-200. [PMID: 18245165] doi:10.1176/appi.ps.59.ii.198 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 36. Miller M , Hairdresser C , Azrael D , Hemenway D , Molnar BE .Recent psychopathology, suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts in households with and without firearms: findings from the National Comorbidity Study Replication. Inj Prev .2009;15:183-7. [PMID: 19494098] doi:10.1136/ip.2008.021352 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 37. Sorenson SB , Vittes KA .Mental health and firearms in community-based surveys: implications for suicide prevention. Eval Rev .2008;32:239-56. [PMID: 18456876] doi:10.1177/0193841X08315871 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 38. Hsieh JK , Arias JJ , Sarmey N , Rose JA , Tousi B .Firearms among cognitively impaired persons: a cross-sectional written report [Letter]. Ann Intern Med .2015;163:485-7. [PMID: 26370021]. doi:x.7326/L15-5138 LinkGoogle Scholar
• 39. Spangenberg KB , Wagner MT , Hendrix S , Bachman DL .Firearm presence in households of patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. J Am Geriatr Soc .1999;47:1183-half-dozen. [PMID: 10522950] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 40. Elbogen EB , Johnson SC .The intricate link between violence and mental disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Weather condition. Curvation Gen Psychiatry .2009;66:152-61. [PMID: 19188537] doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2008.537 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 41. Butkus R , Weissman A .Internists' attitudes toward prevention of firearm injury. Ann Intern Med .2014;160:821-7. [PMID: 24722784]. doi:10.7326/M13-1960 LinkGoogle Scholar
• 42. Cassel CK , Nelson EA , Smith TW , Schwab CW , Barlow B , Gary NE .Internists' and surgeons' attitudes toward guns and firearm injury prevention. Ann Intern Med .1998;128:224-30. [PMID: 9454531]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-128-iii-199802010-00009 LinkGoogle Scholar
• 43. Price JH , Thompson A , Khubchandani J , Wiblishauser M , Dowling J , Teeple 1000 .Perceived roles of emergency department physicians regarding anticipatory guidance on firearm rubber. J Emerg Med .2013;44:1007-16. [PMID: 23352862] doi:ten.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.010 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 44. Dowd MD , Sege RD ;Council on Injury, Violence, and Poisonous substance Prevention Executive Committee.Firearm-related injuries affecting the pediatric population. Pediatrics .2012;130:e1416-23. [PMID: 23080412] doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2481 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 45. Weinberger SE , Hoyt DB , Lawrence HC 3rd , Levin S , Henley DE , Alden ER ,et al.Firearm-related injury and death in the United States: a call to activeness from 8 health professional organizations and the American Bar Association. Ann Intern Med .2015;162:513-6. [PMID: 25706470]. doi:10.7326/M15-0337 LinkGoogle Scholar
• 46. Cost JH , Kinnison A , Dake JA , Thompson AJ , Toll JA .Psychiatrists' practices and perceptions regarding anticipatory guidance on firearms. Am J Prev Med .2007;33:370-iii. [PMID: 17950401] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 47. Betz ME , Miller M , Hairdresser C , Miller I , Sullivan AF , Camargo CA Jr ,et al;ED-SAFE Investigators.Lethal ways restriction for suicide prevention: beliefs and behaviors of emergency section providers. Depress Anxiety .2013;30:1013-twenty. [PMID: 23495002] doi:10.1002/da.22075 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 48. Walters H , Kulkarni M , Forman J , Roeder One thousand , Travis J , Valenstein M .Feasibility and acceptability of interventions to delay gun admission in VA mental health settings. Gen Hosp Psychiatry .2012;34:692-8. [PMID: 22959420] doi:x.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.07.012 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 49. Betz ME , Miller G , Barber C , Beaty B , Miller I , Camargo CA Jr ,et al.Lethal means access and assessment among suicidal emergency department patients. Depress Anxiety .2016. [PMID: 26989850] doi:ten.1002/da.22486 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• l. Dobscha SK , Denneson LM , Kovas AE , Corson K , Helmer DA , Bair MJ .Chief care clinician responses to positive suicidal ideation risk assessments in veterans of Iraq and Transitional islamic state of afghanistan. Gen Hosp Psychiatry .2014;36:310-7. [PMID: 24650585] doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.11.007 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 51. Slovak K , Brewer TW , Carlson K .Customer firearm cess and rubber counseling: the office of social workers. Soc Work .2008;53:358-66. [PMID: 18853672] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 52. Pierson J , Viera AJ , Barnhouse KK , Tulsky JA , Richman BD , Goldstein AO .Physician attitudes and feel with allow applications for concealed weapons [Letter]. N Engl J Med .2014;370:2453-four. [PMID: 24941197] doi:x.1056/NEJMc1401815 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 53. Traylor A , Toll JH , Telljohann SK , King K , Thompson A .Clinical psychologists' firearm run a risk management perceptions and practices. J Community Health .2010;35:60-seven. [PMID: 20094905] doi:10.1007/s10900-009-9200-6 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 54. Slovak K , Brewer TW .Suicide and firearm means restriction: tin training brand a difference? Suicide Life Threat Behav .2010;40:63-73. [PMID: 20170262] doi:ten.1521/suli.2010.40.ane.63 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 55. Betz ME , Wintemute GJ .Doctor counseling on firearm condom: a new kind of cultural competence. JAMA .2015;314:449-50. [PMID: 26241594] doi:10.1001/jama.2015.7055 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 56. McGee KS , Coyne-Beasley T , Johnson RM .Review of evaluations of educational approaches to promote condom storage of firearms. Inj Prev .2003;9:108-11. [PMID: 12810734] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 57. Sege RD , Hatmaker-Flanigan Eastward , DeVos East , Levin-Goodman R , Spivak H .Anticipatory guidance and violence prevention: results from family and pediatrician focus groups. Pediatrics .2006;117:455-63. [PMID: 16452366] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 58. Paola FA .Firearm injury prevention [Letter of the alphabet]. Ann Intern Med .1998;129:336-seven. [PMID: 9729194]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-129-iv-199808150-00020 LinkGoogle Scholar
• 59. Betz ME , Flaten HK , Miller M .Older adult openness to medico questioning near firearms [Letter]. J Am Geriatr Soc .2015;63:2214-five. [PMID: 26480997] doi:x.1111/jgs.13695 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 60. Everett SA , Toll JH , Bedell AW , Telljohann SK .Family unit practice physicians' firearm prophylactic counseling beliefs and behaviors. J Community Health .1997;22:313-24. [PMID: 9353680] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 61. U.South. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2014. Recommendations of the U.Southward. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Inquiry and Quality; 2014. Accessed at www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/guidelines-recommendations/guide/alphabetize.html on 12 April 2016. Google Scholar
• 62. The Joint Committee. National Patient Safe Goals Effective January 1, 2015. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission; 2014. Accessed at www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/half-dozen/2015_NPSG_HAP.pdf on 12 April 2016. Google Scholar
• 63. Barkin SL , Finch SA , Ip EH , Scheindlin B , Craig JA , Steffes J ,et al.Is office-based counseling about media use, timeouts, and firearm storage effective? Results from a cluster-randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics .2008;122:e15-25. [PMID: 18595960] doi:x.1542/peds.2007-2611 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 64. Kruesi MJ , Grossman J , Pennington JM , Woodward PJ , Duda D , Hirsch JG .Suicide and violence prevention: parent education in the emergency department. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry .1999;38:250-5. [PMID: 10087685] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 65. Sherman ME , Burns Thousand , Ignelzi J , Raia J , Lofton V , Toland D ,et al.Firearms risk management in psychiatric intendance. Psychiatr Serv .2001;52:1057-61. [PMID: 11474051] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 66. Albright TL , Burge SK .Improving firearm storage habits: touch on of brief office counseling past family unit physicians. J Am Lath Fam Pract .2003;16:40-half-dozen. [PMID: 12583649] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 67. Carbone PS , Clemens CJ , Brawl TM .Effectiveness of gun-rubber counseling and a gun lock giveaway in a Hispanic community. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med .2005;159:1049-54. [PMID: 16275796] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 68. Brent DA , Baugher One thousand , Birmaher B , Kolko DJ , Bridge J .Compliance with recommendations to remove firearms in families participating in a clinical trial for boyish low. J Am Acad Kid Adolesc Psychiatry .2000;39:1220-6. [PMID: 11026174] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 69. Runyan CW , Becker A , Brandspigel S , Barber C , Trudeau A , Novins D .Lethal means counseling for parents of youth seeking emergency care for suicidality. West J Emerg Med .2016;17:8-14. [PMID: 26823923] doi:x.5811/westjem.2015.11.28590 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 70. Stevens MM , Olson AL , Gaffney CA , Tosteson TD , Mott LA , Starr P .A pediatric, practice-based, randomized trial of drinking and smoking prevention and bicycle helmet, gun, and seatbelt safety promotion. Pediatrics .2002;109:490-7. [PMID: 11875146] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 71. Johnston BD , Rivara FP , Droesch RM , Dunn C , Copass MK .Beliefs change counseling in the emergency section to reduce injury run a risk: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics .2002;110:267-74. [PMID: 12165577] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 72. Grossman DC , Cummings P , Koepsell TD , Marshall J , D'Ambrosio L , Thompson RS ,et al.Firearm safety counseling in primary intendance pediatrics: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics .2000;106:22-half-dozen. [PMID: 10878144] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 73. Purtle J , Dicker R , Cooper C , Corbin T , Greene MB , Marks A ,et al.Hospital-based violence intervention programs save lives and money. J Trauma Acute Care Surg .2013;75:331-3. [PMID: 23887566] doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318294f518 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 74. Purtle J , Rich JA , Fein JA , James T , Corbin TJ .Infirmary-based violence prevention: progress and opportunities. Ann Intern Med .2015;163:715-7. [PMID: 26301734]. doi:10.7326/M15-0586 LinkGoogle Scholar
• 75. Zatzick D , Russo J , Lord SP , Varley C , Wang J , Berliner L ,et al.Collaborative care intervention targeting violence risk behaviors, substance apply, and posttraumatic stress and depressive symptoms in injured adolescents: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr .2014;168:532-ix. [PMID: 24733515] doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4784 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 76. Shaughnessy AF , Cincotta JA , Adelman A .Family unit do patients' attitudes toward firearm condom as a preventive medicine issue: a HARNET Study. Harrisburg Area Enquiry Network. J Am Board Fam Pract .1999;12:354-nine. [PMID: 10534083] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 77. Pinholt EM , Mitchell JD , Butler JH , Kumar H ."Is in that location a gun in the home?" Assessing the risks of gun ownership in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc .2014;62:1142-six. [PMID: 24898055] doi:ten.1111/jgs.12836 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 78. Lum Hard disk drive , Flaten HK , Betz ME .Gun access and rubber practices amongst older adults. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res .2016;2016:2980416. [PMID: 26949391] doi:x.1155/2016/2980416 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 79. Yip PS , Caine E , Yousuf S , Chang SS , Wu KC , Chen YY .Means restriction for suicide prevention. Lancet .2012;379:2393-ix. [PMID: 22726520] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60521-ii CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 80. Cal. Penal Code §18100 (2014). Google Scholar
• 81. Anglemyer A , Horvath T , Rutherford Yard .The accessibility of firearms and risk for suicide and homicide victimization amid household members: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med .2014;160:101-10. [PMID: 24592495]. doi:10.7326/M13-1301 LinkGoogle Scholar
• 82. Wintemute GJ , Parham CA , Beaumont JJ , Wright M , Drake C .Mortality among contempo purchasers of handguns. N Engl J Med .1999;341:1583-9. [PMID: 10564689] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 83. 45 C.F.R. §164.512 (1996). Google Scholar
• 84. Rodriguez L. Letter to U.Southward. Health Care Providers on HIPAA Privacy Rule. 15 July 2013. Google Scholar
• 85. Simon RI .The myth of "imminent" violence in psychiatry and the law. Univ Cincinnati Police force Rev .2006;75:631-44. Google Scholar
• 86. Snyder L ;American Higher of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human being Rights Committee.American College of Physicians Ideals Manual: sixth edition. Ann Intern Med .2012;156:73-104. [PMID: 22213573]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-i-201201031-00001 LinkGoogle Scholar
• 87. American Medical Clan. Opinion 8.082 - Withholding Data from Patients. AMA Code of Medical Ideals. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2006. Accessed at www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ideals/opinion8082.page on 12 February 2016. Google Scholar
• 88. Puttagunta R , Coverdale TR , Coverdale J .What is taught on firearm safety in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education? A review of educational programs. Acad Psychiatry .2016. [PMID: 26911492] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• 89. Vriniotis M , Barber C , Frank E , Demicco R ;New Hampshire Firearm Condom Coalition.A suicide prevention campaign for firearm dealers in New Hampshire. Suicide Life Threat Behav .2015;45:157-63. [PMID: 25348506] doi:10.1111/sltb.12123 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar

riverawithing1994.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m15-2905

Share this post